Definition: And it came to pass, after the year was expired, at the time when kings go forth [to battle], that David sent Joab, and his servants with him, and all Israel; and they destroyed the children of Ammon, and besieged Rabbah. But David tarried still at Jerusalem.
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Samuel 11:1. It's a really important story about betrayal and consequences. Here’s what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: David was invading Ammon and Rabbah. David, the King of Israel, was leading an army to conquer these two territories. He sent his servants with him. He brought a large group of people – including many Israelites – along for the journey. They destroyed some settlements. They attacked and destroyed several villages and towns in Ammon and Rabbah. But David didn’t leave quickly. Instead, he stayed in Jerusalem for a while. Now, let's unpack it a little further: “After the year was expired…” This means this event happened during the last days of the year – before the end of the season. “…at the time when kings go forth [to battle]…” This refers to a time when the King of Israel was sending his soldiers on a military expedition. “That David sent Joab, and his servants with him...” This tells us that David’s army was led by his trusted general, Joab. He had a large group of people under his command. "...and all Israel…” This is the key – all of Israel was involved in this invasion. “…and they destroyed the children of Ammon, and besieged Rabbah.” They attacked and conquered these two towns. The Crucial Part - "But David tarried still at Jerusalem." “But David tarried still...” This is the most important part. David didn't immediately leave the city. He stayed in Jerusalem for a period of time, which is significant. "...at Jerusalem." He remained there, likely to prepare his army or strategize. What does this verse tell us about David? It suggests that David was not entirely trustworthy. He betrayed his people – he attacked and conquered their neighbors – but he didn’t immediately flee the city. This shows a lack of accountability and a willingness to continue his actions even when things were going wrong. It also hints at a potential problem with his leadership. Overall Significance: This verse is a warning about the dangers of disobedience and trusting people who might be untrustworthy. It highlights that David’s actions had serious consequences for Israel, and it shows how he needed to remain vigilant and accountable to his people. --- Do you want me to: Explain this verse in more detail? Connect it to a specific biblical story or theme (like trust, justice, or leadership)?